Realme has baptized this Realme GT that we showed you at the time of launch as a "flagship killer", however, in order to dethrone the expensive terminals of the highest ranges, it is necessary to have a camera to match. The camera is precisely one of the sections where expensive terminals tend to differ the most from the "less expensive" ones.
We analyzed in depth the camera of the new Realme GT to determine if it really is capable of positioning itself among the high-end terminals that it intends to defeat. Stay with us and discover all the details of the camera of this Realme GT.
As always, we recommend that you first go through our video at the top in which we have analyzed in great detail both the camera application of the Realme gt like small clips where we will even observe the video recording. Take the opportunity to subscribe to our channel and help continue growing the community Androidsis in general. In this way we can continue to bring you the best content, the best analysis and above all many tips to get the most out of your Android.
Technical characteristics of the Realme GT
In principle, we are going to take a moment to take a look at all the general technical characteristics of this Realme GT, where its powerful processor stands out. Likewise, you can see the in-depth analysis we recently carried out.
| Technical specifications Realme GT | ||
|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | Realme | |
| Model | GT | |
| Operating system | Android 11 + Realme UI 2.0 | |
| Screen | SuperAMOLED 6.43 "FHD + (2400 * 1080) with 120 Hz refresh rate and 1000 nits | |
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G | |
| RAM | 8 / 12 GB LPDDR5 | |
| Internal storage | 128 / 256 UFS 3.1 | |
| Rear camera | Sony 64MP f / 1.8 IMX682 + 8MP UGA 119º f / 2.3 + 2MP Macro f / 2.4 | |
| Front camera | 16MP f / 2.5 GA 78º | |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth 5.0 - 5G DualSIM- WiFi 6 - NFC - IR - Dual GPS | |
| Battery | 4.500 mAh with Fast Charge 65W | |
Realme GT camera app
We must start the house with the foundations, and in order to take good pictures the first thing we need is precisely a camera application. The Realme UI 2.0 application is quite simple and inevitably reminds us of the one offered by alternatives of the same depth as Apple on iOS and Xiaomi's own camera. However, this is perhaps somewhat more complex. The performance is sovereignly fast and the transition between the different sensors is good and fast, we have not found any problems in this regard.
That said, the app offers good overall performance, as always happens with Realme UI 2.0 so we cannot have a complaint about it. The interface accompanies the quick shot and the most necessary and common functionalities are very close to the finger.
Camera test
We start with the main sensor, more specifically Sony IMX682 with 64MP and aperture f / 1.9 with a composite of six pieces. This Sony sensor is quite proven and offers exactly the result that one would expect from it. Despite announcing 64MP the reality is that the photographic shots are taken in a much lower "resolution", although we can opt for the 64MP shot available in the Realme UI 2.0 camera application.
The camera handles well in shots of all kinds, even at night. It does not suffer with contrasts and we obtain well-defined results that I would even say border on the results of main cameras in much more expensive terminals. The shot is perhaps a bit dark but the color rendering lacks some oversaturation, however, this pleases many users and makes the SuperAMOLED panel look good. It is advisable to take the photographs with the HDR format activated in automatic mode, we will obtain better results and avoid burning the skies in any case.
We continue now with the 8MP Ultra Wide Angle sensor with f / 2.3 aperture of five pieces that has the possibility of capturing content up to 119º. The result begins to drop noticeably, especially when compared to the main sensor. Despite this, aberrations on the sides of Ultra Wide Angle lenses are highly corrected, A bittersweet taste in general terms is going to leave us with this Ultra Wide Angle that begins to suffer a lot with lighting contrasts and especially with even small absences of light. Here we are faced with the first reminder that we are not facing a high-end terminal, especially after the good result of the main sensor.
We find ourselves with an excess of post-processing that causes a feeling of "watercolor", and we already know what this means: We have very little definition in the image. However, with the "night mode" the photo seems to light up as if by magic while taking the shots. However, when we take the capture and zoom in on the image we quickly realize that it is almost completely lacking in definition and the amount of noise is too high.
We continue with the 2MP Macro Sensor with three-piece f / 2.4 aperture intended to help us primarily with content that is excessively close. This sensor offers excessively poor results under adverse lighting or contrast conditions. On the other hand, we have a Digital zoom with two times and five times. The two-magnification takes advantage of the main sensor and the result is supremely good, while the five-magnification one already dulls any type of content and makes it very difficult to take the stabilization.
We go straight to the camera Selfie, a 16MP front freckle with f / 2.5 aperture on a Wide Angle lens capable of absorbing 78º content. It offers a good result even in the contrasts and will even allow us to adjust the Portrait Mode and the Beauty mode. Despite this, we have excessively postprocessed results, as usually happens in this type of terminals. Something we don't even bother to fight with anymore.
The cameras are capable of recording in 4K resolutions up to 60 FPS and we recommend that you take a look at the video that we have in the upper part to see how they make the captures. We have a very good stabilization in the main lens and identical results to the photographic ones in the rest of the sensors, where we directly do without the Macro lens.